<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Some Random Dude &#187; depth-content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.somerandomdude.com/tag/depth-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.somerandomdude.com</link>
	<description>Some Random Dude is a blog by P.J. Onori that covers design &#38; technology in the broadest sense possible.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Next Steps for This Blog. Please Chime In.</title>
		<link>http://www.somerandomdude.com/2011/03/07/next-steps-for-this-blog-please-chime-in/</link>
		<comments>http://www.somerandomdude.com/2011/03/07/next-steps-for-this-blog-please-chime-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 18:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>P.J. Onori</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Evolving Some Random Dude]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depth-content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somerandomdude.com/?p=10158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The big excerpt for this post.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple weeks ago, I abruptly altered the format in which I began to blog. For better or for worse, I have a history of doing things like this. A few years back, I transitioned from exclusively large-form writing to ultra-light content&mdash;often times limited to a single sentence. I was able to generate tons of content on a daily basis, but after years of pushing out content of this genre, I felt that the content being created was severely lacking in depth. So I have tried to find a good middle ground between extremely in-depth content that could take weeks or months to get out due to my schedule and quick, consistent yet shallow updates. In addition, I am really trying to get my own personal process in order rather than relying on gizmos and gadgets as I did in the past. I wanted to post this to both give you an insight as to what is around the corner as well as open the floor to see get your thoughts on this new content format.<span id="more-10158"></span></p>
<p>I am working with a colleague to <em>finally</em> finish up the new design I have been talking about since forever. The whole design will be wrapped up as an open-source WordPress theme and will be available on Github for public use. This new theme will open up a huge chunk of time that I have been devoting to getting this off my back. I plan to fully devote that time towards more quality writing. In addition, I am working on getting my life a bit more organized and structured so that I have time <em>at least</em> three days a week to spend writing. I have also ridded myself of Mint for the last time. That application sucked so many hours out of my life that I find it embarrassing to even think about it. These actions should ensure a higher level of quality and consistency for writing. There has not been a deficit in ideas, just a deficit in time. Lastly, I have a pretty interesting idea for how to collaboratively write long-form content. I should have more about that in the next few weeks.</p>
<p>As for the new way of writing, I am curious what you thought of it, if you even noticed it at all. I would love to hear if you found it more useful to have a level of observation added to each post or if you didn&#8217;t mind just having content simply reference other work. I&#8217;d really like to see this post to generate a discussion as to what you would find helpful from this blog and what you would expect to see in the weeks/months to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.somerandomdude.com/2011/03/07/next-steps-for-this-blog-please-chime-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Am I the Last Person to Hear About Tumblelogs?</title>
		<link>http://www.somerandomdude.com/2007/03/13/tumblelog-blogging/</link>
		<comments>http://www.somerandomdude.com/2007/03/13/tumblelog-blogging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 23:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>P.J. Onori</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concept]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depth-content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somerandomdude.net/blog/current-events/tumblelog-blogging/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the last week or so, I have been hearing a lot about tumblelogs. The concept of the tumblelog has been around for quite a long time and I have seen many examples of sites that fit the bill. I have always liked the idea what is now called a tumblelog because the content is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the last week or so, I have been hearing a lot about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tumblelog">tumblelogs</a>. The concept of the tumblelog has been around for quite a long time and I have seen many <a href="http://www.snarkmarket.com">examples</a> of sites that fit the bill. I have always liked the idea what is now called a tumblelog because the content is easily digestible and content is usually updated much more often. Ironically, this very blog has taken on <em>tumbleblog-esque</em> traits with smaller, daily posts to go along with a longer, more in depth weekly article.</p>
<p>What really interesting here is that there seems to be a trend moving in the short-format direction. In a sense, <a href="http://www.twitter.com">Twitter</a> is the world&#8217;s large public tumblelog. This stream-of-consciousness style of writing is obviously less substantiative, but the format is quite beneficial in its own unique way to both the writer and reader. To the writer, with less time commitment for each post, there is more time to write <em>many</em> more articles during the same span of time. More topics can be covered and current events can be touched on much more quickly. For the readers, they can get the gist of potentially many different topics and then go elsewhere for more in-depth content if they so desire.</p>
<p>The differences in format between blogs and tumblelogs could potentially create a strong symbiotic relationship between the two. Long format, in-depth blog articles are always going to be necessary for readers to get a thorough understanding of a concept or opinion. Still, many people many not be willing to commit to such long articles for various reasons. Tumblelog formats have the potential to whet the appetite of an otherwise unwilling audience. I myself would like to incorporate even more small-format content into this blog &#8211; I mean, who has time to read my long, boring articles?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.somerandomdude.com/2007/03/13/tumblelog-blogging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 1/13 queries in 0.011 seconds using apc
Object Caching 304/325 objects using apc

Served from: www.somerandomdude.com @ 2012-02-09 18:34:27 -->
