<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Some Random Dude &#187; internet-explorer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.somerandomdude.com/tag/internet-explorer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.somerandomdude.com</link>
	<description>Some Random Dude is a blog by P.J. Onori that covers design &#38; technology in the broadest sense possible.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>To Advocate For or Abandon the 10%</title>
		<link>http://www.somerandomdude.com/2008/07/18/the-ten-percent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.somerandomdude.com/2008/07/18/the-ten-percent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>P.J. Onori</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conundrum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet-explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web-projects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somerandomdude.net/blog/opinion/the-ten-percent/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in 2002 or 2003, when Internet Explorer reigned at the undisputed leader in browser market share, I was very outspoken over the need to support all browsers &#8211; even those with only 5% share or less. I argued about the need to provide a consistent experience for all users, regardless of what browser or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in 2002 or 2003, when Internet Explorer reigned at the undisputed leader in browser market share, I was very outspoken over the need to support all browsers &#8211; even those with only 5% share or less. I argued about the need to provide a consistent experience for all users, regardless of what browser or version they decide (or as forced) to use. This ideology was all the easier to adopt considering how had market share at the time &#8211; I feel as though my strong feelings were just as much about not idly allowing the &#8220;evil&#8221; corporate browser to swallow even more share by helping make it the de-facto browser on the internet. Fast forward 5+ years and oh, how the tables are turning. A new generation is jumping online and they&#8217;re not just blindly clicking the blue &#8216;e&#8217; on their desktop. Firefox 3 shattered the record for most downloads and, according to some metrics, is passing up <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-9959427-16.html">20% global market share</a> and <a href="http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/01/firefox-global-market-share-reaches-211/">well above 40%</a> in some European countries. The underdog is now the up-and-comer.<br />
<span id="more-660"></span><br />
Which brings me to why I am writing this article. I am in the process of putting ideas and concepts together for the redesign of somerandomdude.net which has taken me down some very interesting paths. The problem is, many of these ideas are simply not going to work on older browsers &#8211; most notably, Internet Explorer 6. IE6 still comprises roughly 10% of the traffic on this site, which <em>should</em> be far too significant to ignore. Here is the conundrum &#8211; I just do not seem to care. IE6 is, by current standards, a train wreck of a browser. I have seen more web projects than I would like to remember use the majority of their production time just to resolve IE6 issues. Still, I fail to see the philosophical difference between supporting the Netscape 7&#8242;s in 2002 and the Internet Explorer 6&#8242;s in 2008. In fact, IE6 gets more share now than any of the browsers I fought to support did. All that said, I <em>still</em> am leaning towards not supporting it.</p>
<p>My argument towards not supporting IE6 for the new redesign would mean faster production time, and allow me to use publishing methods which would help me post <em>much</em> more frequently. So here&#8217;s the question &#8211; do ends justify the means or is this just an example of hypocrisy at its finest? My justification is continuing to support IE6 will limit what I can do to the blog (in the time I have to build it) in order to make posting easier &#8211; which <em>should</em> allow more content to be published. So, do I continue to give an equal experience to the 10% or give an improved experience to the 90%? This question is not new by any means, but I find myself on the other side of the argument this time.</p>
<p>What are your thoughts on this? Does creating a consistent experience trump a better site for the majority? Do the ends justify the means? Should a compromise be found?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.somerandomdude.com/2008/07/18/the-ten-percent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox still climbing the charts</title>
		<link>http://www.somerandomdude.com/2005/01/19/firefox-still-climbing-the-charts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.somerandomdude.com/2005/01/19/firefox-still-climbing-the-charts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 23:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>P.J. Onori</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet-explorer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somerandomdude.net/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to say I&#8217;m starting to become surprised. The Firefox phenomenon just doesn&#8217;t seem to want to slow down as is apparent with them breaking the 18 million download mark. The upstart browser is now the #1 used browser for my blog and seems to be climbing every week. While it still has some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say I&#8217;m starting to become surprised. The Firefox phenomenon just doesn&#8217;t seem to want to slow down as is apparent with them breaking the 18 million download mark. The upstart browser is now the #1 used browser for my blog and seems to be climbing every week. While it still has some issues with <a href="http://george.hotelling.net/90percent/os_x/firefox_flash_and_os_x.php">Flash on OS X</a>, all-in-all I&#8217;m very satisfied with the 1.0 release and I&#8217;m assuming a large majority of the 18 million or so people that downloaded it are as well.</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;ve been covering Firefox quite a bit on this blog lately, but I really feel that this could be the beginning of a real interesting situation a year or two down the road. I feel a lot of people still using IE are doing so in the thought that IE7 will take care of all the current problems and they&#8217;d rather wait it out than take the time to migrate to a new browser. If this does not happen however, I think there is going to be a huge second movement to Firefox if the open-source browser continues to make improvements on its already solid foundation.</p>
<p>The exposure has been amazing and the hype has pretty much been fulfilled. The next step from Microsoft could really be the defining moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.somerandomdude.com/2005/01/19/firefox-still-climbing-the-charts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 1/13 queries in 0.010 seconds using apc
Object Caching 296/321 objects using apc

Served from: www.somerandomdude.com @ 2012-02-09 20:19:09 -->
