<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Some Random Dude &#187; spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.somerandomdude.com/tag/spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.somerandomdude.com</link>
	<description>Some Random Dude is a blog by P.J. Onori that covers design &#38; technology in the broadest sense possible.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Spam visualizations by Kim Asendorf. via CreativeApplications</title>
		<link>http://www.somerandomdude.com/2009/11/30/spam-visualizations-by-kim-asendorf-via-creativeapplications-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.somerandomdude.com/2009/11/30/spam-visualizations-by-kim-asendorf-via-creativeapplications-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>P.J. Onori</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Found Elsewhere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CreativeApplications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kim Asendorf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visualizations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://somerandomdude.com/stream/tumblr/spam-visualizations-by-kim-asendorf-via-creativeapplications-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spam visualizations by Kim Asendorf. via CreativeApplications]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/wp-content/uploads/37beb_tumblr_ktxrvptYkL1qznk6ho1_500.png" /></p>
<p><a href="http://spamvisualization.net/">Spam visualizations</a> by <a href="http://www.kaubonschen.com/portfolio/">Kim Asendorf</a>. via <a href="http://www.creativeapplications.net/flash/spam-visualization-flash">CreativeApplications</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.somerandomdude.com/2009/11/30/spam-visualizations-by-kim-asendorf-via-creativeapplications-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If a Post is Written and No One Reads It, Did It Ever Exist?</title>
		<link>http://www.somerandomdude.com/2007/01/10/self-promotion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.somerandomdude.com/2007/01/10/self-promotion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>P.J. Onori</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somerandomdude.net/blog/opinion/self-promotion/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Promoting your own site can be a tricky thing. You obviously want people to visit your site, but you do not want to be labeled a spammer in the process. There is a very fine line to be walked when promoting your own site &#8211; and I am not the one to give advice on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="callout">Promoting your own site can be a tricky thing. You obviously want people to visit your site, but you do not want to be labeled a spammer in the process. There is a very fine line to be walked when promoting your own site &#8211; and I am not the one to give advice on how it should be done. What I can say, however, is that we all be lenient towards self-promotion. If not, we might end up missing out on a lot of great new content on the web &#8211; and it just might be from your site.</span><br />
<span id="more-177"></span><br />
I will freely admit, in the early months of writing content for this blog, I was a shameless self-promoter. I would drop links at just about every relevant public news source I could find. I am not a big networker, I do not participate on many forums (due to lack of time) &#8211; so my options were already pretty limited. So I could either reenact the internet version of <em>Waiting for Godot</em> or I could promote my site.</p>
<h3>Do You Know What We Are Missing?</h3>
<p>Everyday I randomly stumble upon great pieces of information that I just happened to find while looking for something completely different. I try to follow all the main link-sharing sites, but each one holds a bias of what gets bubbled to the top &#8211; making some topics highly unrepresented. Many of the things I find can (and should) be on the front page of many link-sharing sites, but it gets unnoticed because the it did not possess the the right type of content, timing, traffic, or luck. To some extent, if the author feels their content is useful and helpful, it is in everyone else&#8217;s best interest for the author to promote it. Obviously, &#8220;useful&#8221; and &#8220;helpful&#8221; are relative terms and going to such lengths as spamming sites with links is <em>never</em> beneficial, not matter how good the content. Still, I much rather have a few annoyances to get a chance to find some hidden gems than otherwise.</p>
<h3>The Bad Apple Spoils the Bunch</h3>
<p>There is quite a bit of hostility to self-promotion and it is rightly deserved. The basic premise of people willing to share their own work for others to read/consume seems quite noble. So there has obviously been some pretty ugly abuse going on for the sharing of information to be so frowned upon. What it boils down to is that people somewhere down the line were less interested in sharing their content then they were about getting people to their site. That train of thought usually ends up with one (or more) of the actions below:</p>
<ol>
<li>Promote every post/feature for their site.</li>
<li>Do not participate (in a positive way) to any discussions about the page they are promoting.</li>
<li>Do not establish at least a minimal relationship with the site(s) they are promoting to.</li>
<li>Have no interest in reciprocation or the effects on the site(s) they over-promote on.</li>
</ol>
<p>We have all seen these sorts of tactics many times in many places. Still, my hope in humanity makes me believe that this is still the minority (albeit a very loud and annoying segment). The portion of people that do decided to participate in these sorts of actions unfortunately ruin it for the rest of the folks on the internet.</p>
<h3>How Not to Come Off As a Jerk</h3>
<p>All of these little tactics above have given link-sharing a very bad reputation. Because of that, it is in our best interest to go over and above the normal etiquette in order to assure people we are not being malicious. Here are a few little tips I like to follow:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Only post in communities where your content will most likely be perceived as useful.</strong><br />
Obvious, but important &#8211; not <em>every</em> online community will care about your genre of writing. Save yourself (and others) some time by posting only to places you are certain will actually care.</li>
<li><strong>Do not blindly post links.</strong><br />
This can really cause you a lot of trouble. Do not just go to sites for the intention of self-promotion and never check in to see how people have responded. For all you know, you could have really annoyed a lot of people, to which it is in your own best interest to try to patch the situation up. Also, some folks may have questions/comments that could create a follow-up discussion.
</li>
<li><strong>Be honest and up-front about your self-promotion.</strong><br />
It is really easy to sign up as another individual as drop your own links as a &#8220;fan&#8221; of the site. First and foremost, it is dishonest and detrimental to the audience. Secondly, you <strong>will</strong> get caught eventually. It always works that way.
</li>
<li><strong>Be willing (and prepared) to accept the possible reactions to your promotion.</strong><br />
As stated earlier, not everyone is going to like self-promoters. Whether it is fair or unfair, it is best to just be ready for trolls to come at you and to not make an ass of yourself when (or if) you respond to them.
</li>
<li><strong>Be gracious if people/sites do not welcome your links.</strong><br />
Better to have a few less visitors come to your site than to upset a large portion of an online community&#8230;
</li>
<li><strong>Be judicious in what pages you promote and the frequency in which you do it.</strong><br />
Believe it or not, not <em>every</em> post we write is worth going door-to-door in order to have people read it. People will understandably get upset if your useless posts are constantly plugging up their source of online news.
</li>
<li><strong>There&#8217;s nothing wrong with posting your own links to Digg, Del.icio.us, etc.</strong><br />
But there is <strong>a lot</strong> wrong with trying to game them.
</li>
<li>
<strong>Return the favor.</strong><br />
If you have benefited from promoting yourself, why not take the time to promote <em>someone else</em> that deserves it as well?
</li>
<li><strong>Know when to quit.</strong><br />
Whether your post or site just does not cause a stir or you are way ahead of your time, if people are not buying it, perhaps you should stop selling it. Also, once you have gotten a fairly good readership, it may not even be worth the trouble doing it anymore.
</li>
</ol>
<p>If anything, follow some of these rules just for the sake of Karma. All that aside, by all means, please continue to promote yourself if you do create content online &#8211; just do it with some common sense and some class. We all may be soon thanking you for doing so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.somerandomdude.com/2007/01/10/self-promotion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 1/13 queries in 0.013 seconds using apc
Object Caching 300/325 objects using apc

Served from: www.somerandomdude.com @ 2012-02-09 11:52:08 -->
